main
Sociology Advocacy presentation
Use browser back button to exit out of image views. This is a static site with no cookies, etc.
No, I don’t identify as being this dude (or whatever); there’s a different point for this. A locally famous news commentator, who’s just perfect in every way conceivable, so quickly resorts to ridicule, ad hominem, of a young lady doing work that is unpopular, but necessary. He resorts to an "ad hominem" posit, which is rather childish.
So Kyle Clark and his little posse turn to ridicule to advance their objective. Cheap shot since by the very nature of the subject matter there’s plenty of ways in which an advocate for the victims of (what’s euphemistically known as) "gender affirmation", e.g. merely a "it’s difficult to discuss" or what-have-you can open the door to an accusation of objectifying people by just using the word "it" as substitute for "the subject", for example.
Of course there is the perpetual (deliberate) "misconstruing" of the anti-trans cause as being about having a problem with the recipients of treatments when (I am sure) that the people who get involved with protesting the ideology of "transgender" are against the people, parents, doctors and medical personnel, who are participants in influencing the victims to self-immolate by sacrificing their sexuality.
Irate Christian conservative eats her words as journalist rolls tape for all to see
Erin Lee’s Transition From Concerned Mom to Anti-Trans Zealot
The negligence is established by the liability, not the liability by the negligence. ~ An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law - Roscoe Pound He also states (which is pertinent too since it’s discussion of nihilism philosophy): "But note that the negligence here is a dogmatic fiction."
See also: The Wikipedia article for "Fundamental attribution error". This site, spnation.org, was used as template if there’s other remnants.
Letter I received from HUD on account of one of my websites. I’ve since moved the content to scapegoated.info
Subject: Housing Discrimination Complaint Inquiry — Termination of Contact
HUD Inquiry Number: 761239
Dear Scott H
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUUD) administratively
enforces the Fair Housing Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §3601, et seq., as amended. The Act
prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other housing-
related transactions, because of race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual
orientation), familial status, national origin, and disability. On February 5, 2024, our office
received the above referenced inquiry you submitted online alleging housing discrimination.
It has come to my immediate attention that you may have engaged in cyberstalking
activities related to a member of our staff. While the matter has been referred to Federal
Protective Service for investigation, the safety of our employees is of the utmost importance to
HUD and our office will take every reasonable precaution in these situations. Your inquiry has
been closed and our office is terminating contact with you as of the date of this letter. This
decision is final, and HUD will no longer respond to your correspondence or telephone calls
about this matter.
You may consult with a private attorney to ascertain any other right of action you may
have under federal, state or local laws. Notwithstanding this termination of contact, you have
the right to pursue a civil action in an appropriate U.S. district court or state court no later than
two (2) years after the occurrence or the termination of an alleged discriminatory housing
practice.
Sincerely,
James Whiteside
Region VIII Director
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
